|
"It's not necessary to be a government agent provocateur. Even the most
well
meaning among us can create chaos and division unless we consider our words
and actions carefully..." Mike Gray, Common Sense for Drug Policy
We're human beings and we're all different. Hardly an enlightened statement,
and while characteristic of many organizations, it is exceptionally true for
political movements. Unlike trade, religious, or illness-based
organizations, groups focused on social change attract people from all walks
of life: different races, ethnicities, sexes, ages, income, backgrounds,
illnesses, personalities, viewpoints, and even taste in pets or colors.
While there is pride in diversity, differences also cause problems and may
result in conflict.
Conflict can be overwhelming because it diverts attention away from the
original mission. Focused on solving internal transgressions, real problems
get ignored. Conflict can fracture efforts that may require a harmonized
front in order to be successful. Ultimately, it can result in the loss of
valuable members and the contributions that they would otherwise have made.
Can you say Cindy Sheehan?
The field of conflict resolution has exploded in recent years, and theories
abound concerning what should be done to avert destructive discord. I
maintain that the potential for conflict is inevitable and innate. Retaining
the 'survival of the fittest' mentality, our core being is programmed to
harass those who divert from community norms, and we must work at being our
better selves to overcome this inherent tendency.
A few suggestions, which can be implemented by each of us right now, may
help reduce conflict so as to regain harmonized motion toward the unified
goal. These represent behaviors rooted in our better selves.
- No Negativity. Negativity can be identified by parsing written or spoken
words for phrases that contain some form of 'no', 'never', or 'not'. He
doesn't. They can't. You won't. Negatives often accompany a benchmark or
judgment framed as black and white. The solution lies in rephrasing negative
statements in the positive. For example, consider the sentence, "Bob never
pays his bills." Maybe has, or maybe he hasn't. The truth usually rests
somewhere between the two extremes. Rephrasing, "Bob has failed to make
bill
payments" may reflect a more correct picture of Bob's payment history.
- Just the Facts Ma'am. Rephrasing a negative in the positive requires a
test of the facts. Anyone who has been hurt by being falsely accused
understands a misapplication of the facts. When the negative statement about
Bob is rephrased in the positive, the next step is to validate it. Is it
true? Does it make sense? Is it logical? With research, we find that "Bob
mailed his January and February car payments five days after their
respective due dates." This more accurate statement partially matches the
original "Bob never pays his bills," but with four months of on-time
payments since then, that original negative statement about Bob is obviously
false and therefore hurtful.
- Purposeful Procrastination. Our inclination is often to address a conflict
immediately after identifying it. But if the problem is phrased in the
negative, it stands a good chance of being inaccurate. Sorting out problems,
rephrasing them, and analyzing them in the positive all take time. If we
label Bob a deadbeat before we research his payment history, we have clearly
done him a disservice. Further, if we act on this perception, conflict will
likely ensue. He'd certainly be angry. Therefore, it's important to take the
time necessary to fully think out the conflict at hand. Spend some quiet
time reflecting on the situation. Examine it from all angles. Ask questions.
Test the facts. Purposefully delay action until you are comfortable with
your command of the problem from multiple perspectives.
- The Art of the Apology. Many damaged relationships have been healed by a
simple apology. Apologizing for wrongdoing, even if unintentional, has
become a mark of character in our 24/7 society where even the smallest
infraction may be video-streamed to millions. Apologies for occurrences
vastly outside of one's control or as a result of coercion sound insincere
and, of course, are factually incorrect. That is why apologies must reflect
a voluntary self-awareness of the mistakes that have been made and the
errors of fact and judgment that led them. Further, an apology is incomplete
if it fails to look to the future and find action steps to keep the problem
from recurring.
- Do Unto Others. As you examine a problem, try to imagine it from the point
of view of other people. If you walked in their shoes, would you behave
differently? Reflect on how Bob would feel if you said in his presence that
he never pays his bills. Would you be embarrassed? Would you be hurt? It has
often been said that one should never make comments behind the backs of
others that couldn't be said to their faces. Better phrased in the positive,
when you speak of others, pretend they are in the room or accidentally
listening on the phone. It may be necessary to be critical, but if you are
confronted by your comments and have applied this filter, you will be seen
as honest and credible among all parties. As one, quite famous person put
it, "Do unto others as you would have others to do you."
You may have noticed that the above suggestions resemble the rights accorded
to us by the U.S. judicial system. However critical we are of it, we still
understand that it is based on the presumption of innocence. Criminal
charges are almost always phrased in the positive (possession of drugs,
failure to yield right of way, or use of property without permission) and
require facts, proof, and deliberation before rendering a conviction and
applying a sanction. Surely we would accord to ourselves and our colleagues
the same rights we would expect from the criminal justice system.
In the final analysis, conflict among different human beings may be
inevitable. But, we are ultimately judged less by the conflict itself and
more by how it is handled and resolved. Positive, well-thought out, and
properly timed solutions stand a much better chance of creating the harmony
necessary to accomplish difficult tasks and unite very different people. Let
it begin with me.
======
Let there be peace on earth,
and let it begin with me.
Let there be peace on Earth,
the peace that was meant to be.
With God as our Father,
brothers all are we.
Let me walk with my brother,
in perfect harmony.
Let peace begin with me,
let this be the moment now.
With every step I take,
let this be my solemn vow,
To take each moment and live
each moment in peace, eternally.
Let there be Peace on Earth,
and let it begin with me. |