spacer
spacer
header
Main Menu
Home
Search
Donate
About OPN
Contact Us
Membership
OPAN
News
Event Calendar
Projects
FREE Cannabis
Jury Power
Medical Maps
Speakers
OPN on the Radio
Legal
Media
Patient/Doctor
Patient Profiles
Online Store
Library
Links
FAQs
Interactive
Email Discussion
Teamspeak
MySpace
OPNTalk Forums
OPNews
OPNews Signup
Recent Issues
Archives
Video
Mikeee Show
Ohio Patients Imprisoned
Randy Brush
In Memoriam
 
Home arrow News arrow OPNews June 2007 arrow UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs decides against reclassification of dronabinol

UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs decides against reclassification of dronabinol PDF Print E-mail

On its 50th meeting held in Vienna from 12-16 March 2007 the Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND) of the UN decided against a rescheduling of dronabinol (THC), the main active principle of cannabis, from Schedule II to Schedule III of the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances, as it was proposed by the Expert Committee of the World Health Organisation (WHO) at its meeting in 2006.

The WHO stated that the substance has a moderate therapeutic usefulness and as a result of continuing clinical research, its medical use is likely to increase. It found that Schedule III is more appropriate and that its present listing in Schedule II is outdated. The WHO estimated the abuse risk for dronabinol to be very low. However, in the notification process of the CND meeting several countries and in particular the US were strongly opposed to rescheduling. In addition, the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) of the UN spoke out against the WHO recommendation in its 2006 Annual Report and at the CND plenary. According to the Board, there have been reports of its abuse in a country in which it is prescribed most, meaning the US. However, the US in its extensive written comments to the WHO on dronabinol had mentioned only "low levels of diversion and abuse".

In the oral statements only two out of 15 speakers expressed themselves in favour of the proposed rescheduling. Several speakers questioned the scientific basis of the recommendation. The lack of support was a remarkable difference with the written replies the WHO had received in past months, where 11 out of 13 countries had made clear they had no objections to the proposed rescheduling. Canada was at least honest in its rejection, commending the WHO for its "excellent expert advice", the validity of which they did not question, but making clear that for other considerations the government could not support rescheduling because it "may send a confusing message with regard to the risks associated to cannabis use".

More information on the debate on dronabinol at the CND 2007 Meeting is available in a report by the International Drug Policy Consortium at: http://www.idpc.info/docs/IDPC_Report_5.pdf

(Source: IDPC Report of the CND Meeting of March 2007)

spacer
Join/Donate
via Paypal
GoodSearch: You Search...We Give!
Ohio Medical Marijuana Act

Please contact your legislators regarding the Ohio Medical Marijuana Act!

The Zoretic Patient Defense Fund
To donate to the Zoretic Patient Defense Fund, OPN's patient legal defense fund, simply click the above button. Before entering the amount, please indicate that your donation is for the Zoretic Patient Defense Fund in the Payment For: text box. Thank you for your contribution!

Advertisement
War on Junk
A riotous exploration of prohibition policies, told through the narrative lens of a future America in which the government outlaws junk food in response to widespread obesity. Click on the image to buy this book now. 10% of the purchase price will be donated to OPN.

 
Copyright 2000 - 2005 Miro International Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
Mambo is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.
spacer