spacer
spacer
header
Main Menu
Home
Search
Donate
About OPN
Contact Us
Membership
OPAN
News
Event Calendar
Projects
FREE Cannabis
Jury Power
Medical Maps
Speakers
OPN on the Radio
Legal
Media
Patient/Doctor
Patient Profiles
Online Store
Library
Links
FAQs
Interactive
Email Discussion
Teamspeak
MySpace
OPNTalk Forums
OPNews
OPNews Signup
Recent Issues
Archives
Video
Mikeee Show
Ohio Patients Imprisoned
Randy Brush
In Memoriam
 
Home arrow News arrow OPNews April 2006 arrow STATE ASKS COURT TO TOSS SD COUNTY MEDICAL MARIJUANA SUIT

STATE ASKS COURT TO TOSS SD COUNTY MEDICAL MARIJUANA SUIT PDF Print E-mail

NORTH COUNTY, CA ---- State officials formally asked judges to throw out San Diego County's precedent-setting lawsuit seeking to overturn California's 10-year-old medical marijuana law, saying that the only controversy over the law was in the minds of county supervisors.

State Attorney General Bill Lockyer's office argued in motions filed Tuesday in Superior Court that San Diego County supervisors simply "disliked" California's voter-approved "Compassionate Use Act," and that there was no legal reason for the courts to entertain their lawsuit.

Nathan Barankin, spokesman for Lockyer, said that the state's position was essentially that the county's lawsuit was simply a request for the courts to rule on the legality of California's law, and involved no actual parties in dispute.

"Because courts can only hear cases that involve real factual disputes between opposing parties, and because there is no actual dispute here, such a request for an advisory opinion requires dismissal of the charges," Barankin said.

He said the courts could rule on the state's motion in May.

The county of San Diego, in a move that angered local medical marijuana patients and marijuana advocacy groups, filed a lawsuit in December in federal court seeking to overturn the Compassionate Use Act, which allows the use of medicinal marijuana.

The supervisors ---- who have collectively opposed the law since it was placed on the 1996 ballot ---- argue that it should be "pre-empted" by federal law, which says that all marijuana use is illegal and that the drug has no medicinal value.

San Diego County lawyers abruptly switched the lawsuit from federal to state court in February, as a tactical move in the hopes of avoiding the U.S.  Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which has been more friendly to marijuana supporters than to opponents in recent rulings.

County officials have been waiting for the state's response ever since, but did not return calls Tuesday.

However, county Counsel John Sansone said Monday that he would not be surprised if the state asked for a "demurrer," a motion to throw out the county's lawsuit.

San Diego County officials and marijuana advocacy groups say the lawsuit is precedent-setting because it marks the first time a county has sued to overturn any of the medical marijuana laws approved by voters in 11 states.

Barankin, meanwhile, said Tuesday that the attorney general's office also filed a motion Tuesday asking the courts to throw out San Bernardino County's medical marijuana challenge.

San Bernardino supervisors, in a show of support for San Diego County, filed their own lawsuit shortly after San Diego County's action.

San Diego County's board has largely ignored California's medical marijuana law since it was passed in 1996, and was actually chastised by its own grand jury in 2005 for doing "nothing" to help implement the law.

However, late last year, the state ordered counties to create an identification card and registration program to help medical marijuana patients ---- and law enforcement officials ---- by clearly identifying who could use the drug legally under state law.

But, by a 3-2 vote, with Supervisors Greg Cox and Ron Roberts opposed, the board voted in December to defy the state's orders.

Shortly after that, the board voted 4-0, with Roberts absent, to actually sue to try to overturn the Compassionate Use Act itself, and named the state Department of Health Services and department Director Sandra Shewry as defendants.

But the state's motion Tuesday argued that the county artificially created an issue for the courts to review the Compassionate Use Act.

"San Diego's political leadership cannot create a ripe controversy by threatening to disobey the law," the motion stated. 

Newshawk: http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm
Pubdate: Wed, 22 Mar 2006
Source: North County Times (Escondido, CA)
Copyright: 2006 North County Times
Contact: letters@nctimes.com
Website: http://www.nctimes.com
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1080
Note: Gives LTE priority to North San Diego County and Southwest Riverside County residents
Author: Gig Conaughton, Staff Writer

spacer
Join/Donate
via Paypal
GoodSearch: You Search...We Give!
Ohio Medical Marijuana Act

Please contact your legislators regarding the Ohio Medical Marijuana Act!

The Zoretic Patient Defense Fund
To donate to the Zoretic Patient Defense Fund, OPN's patient legal defense fund, simply click the above button. Before entering the amount, please indicate that your donation is for the Zoretic Patient Defense Fund in the Payment For: text box. Thank you for your contribution!

Advertisement
War on Junk
A riotous exploration of prohibition policies, told through the narrative lens of a future America in which the government outlaws junk food in response to widespread obesity. Click on the image to buy this book now. 10% of the purchase price will be donated to OPN.

 
Copyright 2000 - 2005 Miro International Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
Mambo is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.
spacer